KMID : 0360220150560040515
|
|
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015 Volume.56 No. 4 p.515 ~ p.520
|
|
Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Postoperative Refraction in Cataract Patients between Galilei-G6¨Þ and IOL Master¨Þ
|
|
Lee Jung-Wook
Park Seung-Hun Seong Min-Cheol Cho Hee-Yoon Kang Min-Ho
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: To compare the axial lengths, anterior chamber depths, and keratometric measurements and to predict postoperative refractions of Dual Scheimpflug analyzer Galilei G6¨Þ and intra ocular lens (IOL) Master¨Þ.
Methods: A total of 50 eyes in 50 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry were measured using 2 types of partial coherence interferometries (Galilei G6¨Þ and IOL Master¨Þ). The SRK/T formula was used to calculate IOL power and the predictive error which subtracts predictive refraction from postoperative refraction was compared between the ocular biometry devices.
Results: Axial lengths were 23.36 ¡¾ 0.80 mm and 23.36 ¡¾ 0.90 mm measured by Galilei G6¨Þ and IOL Master?, respectively. Axial length measured by Galilei G6¨Þ was not statistically significant compared with IOL Master¨Þ (p = 0.321). The anterior chamber depth and keratometry were 3.22 ¡¾ 0.35 mm and 44.29 ¡¾ 1.40 D measured by Galilei G6¨Þ and 3.11 ¡¾ 0.46 mm and 44.39 ¡¾ 1.41 D measured by IOL Master¨Þ, respectively. The differences of anterior chamber depth and keratometry between the 2 devices were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively). The mean absolute prediction errors were 0.45 ¡¾ 0.37 D and 0.49 ¡¾ 0.39 D in Galilei G6¨Þ and IOL Master¨Þ.respectively and was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.423).
Conclusions: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Galilei G6¨Þ were as accurate as with IOL Master¨Þ.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Axial length, Galilei G6¨Þ, IOL Master¨Þ, Partial coherence interferometry
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|